<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1463 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290432</link>
    <description>Section 72A of the Income-tax Act regulates the post-amalgamation treatment of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation, including the conditions for carry forward and set-off in the hands of the amalgamated company. It does not, by itself, bar amalgamation merely because the transaction may affect revenue or create loss utilisation benefits. The provision operates after amalgamation and any possible tax consequence to the Revenue is not a legal ground to refuse sanction. A request to reopen a long-settled amalgamation order was also declined because of the delay and the prejudice that would result to the amalgamated company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1463 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290432</link>
      <description>Section 72A of the Income-tax Act regulates the post-amalgamation treatment of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation, including the conditions for carry forward and set-off in the hands of the amalgamated company. It does not, by itself, bar amalgamation merely because the transaction may affect revenue or create loss utilisation benefits. The provision operates after amalgamation and any possible tax consequence to the Revenue is not a legal ground to refuse sanction. A request to reopen a long-settled amalgamation order was also declined because of the delay and the prejudice that would result to the amalgamated company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>