<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1508 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290436</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality and applicability of Section 364A IPC, affirming the death penalty for kidnapping and murdering the victim for ransom. The Court emphasized the gravity of the offense and the need for stringent punishment to deter such crimes. Judicial discretion in sentencing was acknowledged, and the principle of proportionality was considered, ultimately concluding that the death penalty in this case was justified as a &quot;rarest of rare&quot; scenario warranting extreme punishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1508 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290436</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality and applicability of Section 364A IPC, affirming the death penalty for kidnapping and murdering the victim for ransom. The Court emphasized the gravity of the offense and the need for stringent punishment to deter such crimes. Judicial discretion in sentencing was acknowledged, and the principle of proportionality was considered, ultimately concluding that the death penalty in this case was justified as a &quot;rarest of rare&quot; scenario warranting extreme punishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>