<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1508 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290436</link>
    <description>A final judgment of the Supreme Court cannot be reopened through collateral writ proceedings under Articles 32 or 226 once the issue has been decided on merits; reconsideration lies only through the Court&#039;s exceptional constitutional powers. Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code is not confined to ransom cases involving the Government, a foreign State or an international inter-governmental organisation: its text and structure cover kidnapping or abduction for ransom by private persons as well. The provision&#039;s punishment scheme is not unconstitutional merely because it permits death or life imprisonment, since sentencing discretion remains with the court and the penalty is not shown to be grossly disproportionate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1508 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290436</link>
      <description>A final judgment of the Supreme Court cannot be reopened through collateral writ proceedings under Articles 32 or 226 once the issue has been decided on merits; reconsideration lies only through the Court&#039;s exceptional constitutional powers. Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code is not confined to ransom cases involving the Government, a foreign State or an international inter-governmental organisation: its text and structure cover kidnapping or abduction for ransom by private persons as well. The provision&#039;s punishment scheme is not unconstitutional merely because it permits death or life imprisonment, since sentencing discretion remains with the court and the penalty is not shown to be grossly disproportionate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>