https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290422 The Supreme Court clarified that the term "date fixed" in Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963, refers to a specific and definite date for performance, not one to be inferred from surrounding circumstances. The Court emphasized the importance of a clear timeline and referred the matter back to the Division Bench for further consideration. This decision provides guidance on determining the date of performance and the plaintiff's notice of refusal, underscoring the significance of a fixed and unambiguous date in legal proceedings. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:20:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290422 The Supreme Court clarified that the term "date fixed" in Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963, refers to a specific and definite date for performance, not one to be inferred from surrounding circumstances. The Court emphasized the importance of a clear timeline and referred the matter back to the Division Bench for further consideration. This decision provides guidance on determining the date of performance and the plaintiff's notice of refusal, underscoring the significance of a fixed and unambiguous date in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290422