<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 332 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290420</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;Collector&quot; under the Municipalities Act was read with the Bombay General Clauses Act and the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code so that, when the Collector was on casual leave, the Additional Collector could temporarily discharge the Collector&#039;s functions. The Article states that Section 10 of the Land Revenue Code operates as a continuity provision and that casual leave falls within the Collector being unable to perform duties. On that basis, a resignation handed to the Additional Collector was validly received under Section 53(2) of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, took effect on 16-12-1992, and was not undone by a later withdrawal on the same day.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 332 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290420</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;Collector&quot; under the Municipalities Act was read with the Bombay General Clauses Act and the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code so that, when the Collector was on casual leave, the Additional Collector could temporarily discharge the Collector&#039;s functions. The Article states that Section 10 of the Land Revenue Code operates as a continuity provision and that casual leave falls within the Collector being unable to perform duties. On that basis, a resignation handed to the Additional Collector was validly received under Section 53(2) of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, took effect on 16-12-1992, and was not undone by a later withdrawal on the same day.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>