https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290420 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the validity of the petitioner's resignation effective from 16-12-1992. It held that the Additional Collector had the authority to accept the resignation, deeming the withdrawal invalid as it was submitted after the resignation took effect. The court also rejected the objection on alternative remedies and interpreted the term "Collector" in accordance with the General Clauses Act and the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. en-us Thu, 29 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:27:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290420 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the validity of the petitioner's resignation effective from 16-12-1992. It held that the Additional Collector had the authority to accept the resignation, deeming the withdrawal invalid as it was submitted after the resignation took effect. The court also rejected the objection on alternative remedies and interpreted the term "Collector" in accordance with the General Clauses Act and the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290420