<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 414 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290418</link>
    <description>For Section 3(3) of COFEPOSA, the five-day period for communicating grounds of detention is computed from the date of detention by excluding the first day. The reasoning follows the settled rule of time computation, consistent with Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, where time runs from a specified date. The available text addresses only this computation issue and does not disclose the final outcome on the broader detention challenges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:16:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 414 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290418</link>
      <description>For Section 3(3) of COFEPOSA, the five-day period for communicating grounds of detention is computed from the date of detention by excluding the first day. The reasoning follows the settled rule of time computation, consistent with Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, where time runs from a specified date. The available text addresses only this computation issue and does not disclose the final outcome on the broader detention challenges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>