https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290418 The court upheld the legality of the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act, confirming the timely service of the grounds of detention within the prescribed period. It dismissed the petitioner's arguments concerning non-transmission of representations, document discrepancies, and consideration of irrelevant material. The court acknowledged a delay by the sponsoring authority in responding to the petitioner's representation and directed an explanation within five days, scheduling further consideration of the matter for February 10, 1995. en-us Mon, 30 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:16:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290418 The court upheld the legality of the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act, confirming the timely service of the grounds of detention within the prescribed period. It dismissed the petitioner's arguments concerning non-transmission of representations, document discrepancies, and consideration of irrelevant material. The court acknowledged a delay by the sponsoring authority in responding to the petitioner's representation and directed an explanation within five days, scheduling further consideration of the matter for February 10, 1995. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290418