<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 969 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398850</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, holding that telecommunication charges and foreign currency expenditure should be excluded from total turnover. However, the court sided with the revenue in the dispute over including income received as notice pay from employees in the turnover calculation, stating that it should not be included in either total or export turnover. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 969 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398850</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, holding that telecommunication charges and foreign currency expenditure should be excluded from total turnover. However, the court sided with the revenue in the dispute over including income received as notice pay from employees in the turnover calculation, stating that it should not be included in either total or export turnover. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>