<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 956 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271AAB to be invalid due to vagueness and failure to specify the exact charge. Consequently, the penalty order was set aside, and the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid. The appeal was allowed, and the imposed penalty under Section 271AAB was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:52:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 956 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271AAB to be invalid due to vagueness and failure to specify the exact charge. Consequently, the penalty order was set aside, and the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid. The appeal was allowed, and the imposed penalty under Section 271AAB was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>