<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 951 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398832</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the imported split air-conditioners should be classified under tariff item no. 84151010, setting aside the impugned order. The tribunal highlighted the significance of accurate classification and adherence to the General Rules for Interpretation of Import Tariff. The decision was rendered on 11/09/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 951 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398832</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the imported split air-conditioners should be classified under tariff item no. 84151010, setting aside the impugned order. The tribunal highlighted the significance of accurate classification and adherence to the General Rules for Interpretation of Import Tariff. The decision was rendered on 11/09/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>