https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23320 Where an assessee has already availed an efficacious statutory remedy under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, simultaneous invocation of Article 226 is not appropriate because writ jurisdiction is not a concurrent remedy where an adequate statutory avenue exists. The text states that the challenge to the assessment orders and the Tribunal's order could be pursued through the reference application already filed, and that this statutory path displaced parallel recourse to writ proceedings. The writ appeal was therefore found not to warrant interference and was dismissed. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:00:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23320 Where an assessee has already availed an efficacious statutory remedy under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, simultaneous invocation of Article 226 is not appropriate because writ jurisdiction is not a concurrent remedy where an adequate statutory avenue exists. The text states that the challenge to the assessment orders and the Tribunal's order could be pursued through the reference application already filed, and that this statutory path displaced parallel recourse to writ proceedings. The writ appeal was therefore found not to warrant interference and was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 12 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23320