<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 940 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition, ruling that the non-payment of lease rent does not constitute an &#039;Operational Debt&#039; under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Consequently, the Petitioner does not qualify as an &#039;Operational Creditor&#039;. Additionally, a pre-existing dispute over the debt existed, leading to the dismissal of the Petition. The Tribunal advised the Petitioner to seek recovery through alternative legal avenues. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:51:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 940 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition, ruling that the non-payment of lease rent does not constitute an &#039;Operational Debt&#039; under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Consequently, the Petitioner does not qualify as an &#039;Operational Creditor&#039;. Additionally, a pre-existing dispute over the debt existed, leading to the dismissal of the Petition. The Tribunal advised the Petitioner to seek recovery through alternative legal avenues. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>