<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398820</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand for fresh quantification and validation of claims, with all penalties except for section 78 set aside. The Tribunal directed the original authority to re-compute the tax liability net of exclusions and allow the appellant to exercise options for abatement and validate CENVAT credit claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398820</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand for fresh quantification and validation of claims, with all penalties except for section 78 set aside. The Tribunal directed the original authority to re-compute the tax liability net of exclusions and allow the appellant to exercise options for abatement and validate CENVAT credit claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>