<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23318</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice under section 25(2) of the Wealth-tax Act for assessment years 1966-67 to 1971-72. It found the valuation of immovable property did not conform to section 7 of the Act and declared the Valuation Officer&#039;s report invalid. Emphasizing proper adherence to statutory provisions, the court ruled the impugned notice and proceedings lacked legal support, making the rule absolute and dismissing any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:52:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23318</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice under section 25(2) of the Wealth-tax Act for assessment years 1966-67 to 1971-72. It found the valuation of immovable property did not conform to section 7 of the Act and declared the Valuation Officer&#039;s report invalid. Emphasizing proper adherence to statutory provisions, the court ruled the impugned notice and proceedings lacked legal support, making the rule absolute and dismissing any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>