<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Input Services Excluded from ITC Refunds Under Inverted Duty Structure per Section 54, Rule 89(5.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54902</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilised ITC - inverted duty structure - Denial on Input services - Explanation to Section 54 uses the terms &quot;inputs&quot; and &quot;input services&quot; separately and distinctively, thereby indicating the legislative intent to distinguish one from the other - we are unable to countenance with the submission that the word &#039;&#039;inputs&#039;&#039; should be read so as to include &#039;&#039;input services&#039;&#039; merely because the undefined word &#039;&#039;output supplies&#039;&#039; is used in Section 54(3)(ii)- it is not necessary to interpret Rule 89(5) and, in particular, the definition of Net ITC therein so as to include the words input services. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:40:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:43:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Input Services Excluded from ITC Refunds Under Inverted Duty Structure per Section 54, Rule 89(5.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54902</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilised ITC - inverted duty structure - Denial on Input services - Explanation to Section 54 uses the terms &quot;inputs&quot; and &quot;input services&quot; separately and distinctively, thereby indicating the legislative intent to distinguish one from the other - we are unable to countenance with the submission that the word &#039;&#039;inputs&#039;&#039; should be read so as to include &#039;&#039;input services&#039;&#039; merely because the undefined word &#039;&#039;output supplies&#039;&#039; is used in Section 54(3)(ii)- it is not necessary to interpret Rule 89(5) and, in particular, the definition of Net ITC therein so as to include the words input services. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:40:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>