<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 917 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. Regarding the loss incurred on precious metal, the Tribunal directed the AO to amortize the abnormal loss over two years. For the expenses incurred on road repair, the Tribunal upheld the capital nature of the expenses but directed the AO to allow depreciation on the cost of constructing the road.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 917 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. Regarding the loss incurred on precious metal, the Tribunal directed the AO to amortize the abnormal loss over two years. For the expenses incurred on road repair, the Tribunal upheld the capital nature of the expenses but directed the AO to allow depreciation on the cost of constructing the road.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>