https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398778 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the confiscation of seized goods and imposition of fines, demand, interest, and penalties on the appellant firm and partner. The Revenue's failure to provide sufficient evidence and investigations into clandestine activities led to the appeals being allowed, with the demand for duty not being sustained. The Tribunal noted the lack of support for allegations of illicit plywood production and the absence of proper documentation for resin consumption calculations, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:55:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398778 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the confiscation of seized goods and imposition of fines, demand, interest, and penalties on the appellant firm and partner. The Revenue's failure to provide sufficient evidence and investigations into clandestine activities led to the appeals being allowed, with the demand for duty not being sustained. The Tribunal noted the lack of support for allegations of illicit plywood production and the absence of proper documentation for resin consumption calculations, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398778