<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 2 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23307</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Appellate Tribunal to refer specific questions regarding the eligibility for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act for commission payments made in India for exports to the U.S.S.R. The judgment emphasized the burden of proof on the assessee to establish expenses were incurred outside India. It also addressed the acceptance of a Special Bench decision and a circular by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The Court found the question referred in the Income-tax Referred Cases to be vague and declined to answer it, disposing of the original petitions and references without costs. The judgment was forwarded to the Appellate Tribunal for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 2 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23307</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Appellate Tribunal to refer specific questions regarding the eligibility for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act for commission payments made in India for exports to the U.S.S.R. The judgment emphasized the burden of proof on the assessee to establish expenses were incurred outside India. It also addressed the acceptance of a Special Bench decision and a circular by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The Court found the question referred in the Income-tax Referred Cases to be vague and declined to answer it, disposing of the original petitions and references without costs. The judgment was forwarded to the Appellate Tribunal for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>