<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2021 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the appellants against duty liability, penalty, and interest under the Central Excise Act. It was determined that cutting and slitting of CR/HR Coils did not amount to manufacturing excisable goods based on case law precedent and CBEC circulars. Consequently, waste and scrap generated during this process were not subject to Central Excise duty. The Tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized the non-leviability of duty on waste and scrap, leading to the allowance of all appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:16:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2021 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the appellants against duty liability, penalty, and interest under the Central Excise Act. It was determined that cutting and slitting of CR/HR Coils did not amount to manufacturing excisable goods based on case law precedent and CBEC circulars. Consequently, waste and scrap generated during this process were not subject to Central Excise duty. The Tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized the non-leviability of duty on waste and scrap, leading to the allowance of all appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>