https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290391 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD, in a judgment by Hon'ble Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial), addressed three appeals concerning interest on differential duty paid due to price variation in contracts. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision against the appellant, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of CCE, Pune vs. SKF Ltd. The Tribunal found no reason to overturn the orders, as the Supreme Court had clarified in the Steel Authority of India Limited case that interest on differential duty is payable from the date it was required to be paid until the actual payment date. Consequently, all three appeals were dismissed. en-us Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:16:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290391 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD, in a judgment by Hon'ble Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial), addressed three appeals concerning interest on differential duty paid due to price variation in contracts. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision against the appellant, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of CCE, Pune vs. SKF Ltd. The Tribunal found no reason to overturn the orders, as the Supreme Court had clarified in the Steel Authority of India Limited case that interest on differential duty is payable from the date it was required to be paid until the actual payment date. Consequently, all three appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290391