<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 885 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398766</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the First Appellate Authority to review and decide on the appeal within three weeks, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s participation. The bank guarantee should not be encashed until the appellate authority issues orders and communicates them to the petitioner. The petitioner must provide copies of the judgment and petition to the respondents and the First Appellate Authority for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 885 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398766</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the First Appellate Authority to review and decide on the appeal within three weeks, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s participation. The bank guarantee should not be encashed until the appellate authority issues orders and communicates them to the petitioner. The petitioner must provide copies of the judgment and petition to the respondents and the First Appellate Authority for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>