https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398764 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the detention order for a consignment of watches valued at Rs. 8.99, discounted from Rs. 4,49,550, due to the absence of a valid e-way bill. The judgment emphasized that an e-way bill is required only for consignments exceeding Rs. 50,000, thereby declaring the detention unjustified. The Court ordered the immediate release of the goods and the vehicle to the petitioner upon presenting a copy of the judgment, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions and upholding procedural fairness in GST transportation matters. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398764 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the detention order for a consignment of watches valued at Rs. 8.99, discounted from Rs. 4,49,550, due to the absence of a valid e-way bill. The judgment emphasized that an e-way bill is required only for consignments exceeding Rs. 50,000, thereby declaring the detention unjustified. The Court ordered the immediate release of the goods and the vehicle to the petitioner upon presenting a copy of the judgment, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions and upholding procedural fairness in GST transportation matters. Case-Laws GST Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398764