<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 865 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all the assessment years (2005-06 to 2010-11) and deleted the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c). The penalties were based on estimated additions without specific findings of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be levied on estimated additions without evidence of concealment, citing various case laws to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:41:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 865 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all the assessment years (2005-06 to 2010-11) and deleted the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c). The penalties were based on estimated additions without specific findings of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be levied on estimated additions without evidence of concealment, citing various case laws to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>