<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 860 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the additions made under Section 50C and Sections 69C and 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that the transactions were of a business nature, not capital gains, and emphasized the need for accurate income assessment to avoid imposing excessive tax burdens on taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 860 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the additions made under Section 50C and Sections 69C and 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that the transactions were of a business nature, not capital gains, and emphasized the need for accurate income assessment to avoid imposing excessive tax burdens on taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>