<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 851 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398732</link>
    <description>The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate matters related to company management, oppression, and mismanagement, as the NCLT has exclusive jurisdiction under the Companies Act. The trial court&#039;s order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, directing the grievances to be resolved by the NCLT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 851 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398732</link>
      <description>The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate matters related to company management, oppression, and mismanagement, as the NCLT has exclusive jurisdiction under the Companies Act. The trial court&#039;s order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, directing the grievances to be resolved by the NCLT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>