<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 832 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398713</link>
    <description>Service tax under the goods transport agency regime was examined for transportation of marble blocks by individual truck owners where no consignment note was issued. The decisive point was that, without a consignment note, the transport arrangement did not satisfy the statutory requirements of GTA service, so reverse charge could not be used as the charging basis to impose liability on the recipients. On that footing, service tax was not payable on the impugned transportation activity and the demand could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:03:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 832 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398713</link>
      <description>Service tax under the goods transport agency regime was examined for transportation of marble blocks by individual truck owners where no consignment note was issued. The decisive point was that, without a consignment note, the transport arrangement did not satisfy the statutory requirements of GTA service, so reverse charge could not be used as the charging basis to impose liability on the recipients. On that footing, service tax was not payable on the impugned transportation activity and the demand could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>