<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1280 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the exclusion of a 92-day period from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to operational challenges stemming from litigations impacting the process. The exclusion was granted to address the adverse effects on the CIRP caused by non-payment issues with power suppliers and disputes with distribution companies. The decision aimed to provide necessary time for exploring resolution possibilities and maximizing the value of the Corporate Debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:23:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1280 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the exclusion of a 92-day period from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to operational challenges stemming from litigations impacting the process. The exclusion was granted to address the adverse effects on the CIRP caused by non-payment issues with power suppliers and disputes with distribution companies. The decision aimed to provide necessary time for exploring resolution possibilities and maximizing the value of the Corporate Debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>