<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 830 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398711</link>
    <description>The anti-profiteering challenge concerned interim relief during the pandemic, with the petitioner seeking time to pay the principal profiteered amount in instalments and protection against interest and penalty. The court, following earlier similar orders, directed deposit of the principal profiteered amount and the GST component already identified in the impugned order in six equated monthly instalments commencing on 30 September 2020. It also stayed the interest component and the penalty proceedings until further orders, thereby granting limited interim protection while preserving the substantive dispute for later consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 830 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398711</link>
      <description>The anti-profiteering challenge concerned interim relief during the pandemic, with the petitioner seeking time to pay the principal profiteered amount in instalments and protection against interest and penalty. The court, following earlier similar orders, directed deposit of the principal profiteered amount and the GST component already identified in the impugned order in six equated monthly instalments commencing on 30 September 2020. It also stayed the interest component and the penalty proceedings until further orders, thereby granting limited interim protection while preserving the substantive dispute for later consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>