<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 825 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398706</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, upholding the decision of the Appellate Tribunal to quash the revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of satisfying the conditions of error and prejudice for invoking revisional jurisdiction, highlighting the need for a substantive error causing a loss of revenue to exercise such powers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 825 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398706</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, upholding the decision of the Appellate Tribunal to quash the revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of satisfying the conditions of error and prejudice for invoking revisional jurisdiction, highlighting the need for a substantive error causing a loss of revenue to exercise such powers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>