<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 809 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398690</link>
    <description>Pending consideration of the legality of seizure and the preliminary objection on alternative remedy, the Gujarat High Court balanced business hardship against revenue protection at the interim stage. It directed provisional release of the remaining seized goods on furnishing a bank guarantee, while allowing the DRI to retain goods up to the specified value. The merits of the seizure and the objection remained open for later examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:36:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 809 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398690</link>
      <description>Pending consideration of the legality of seizure and the preliminary objection on alternative remedy, the Gujarat High Court balanced business hardship against revenue protection at the interim stage. It directed provisional release of the remaining seized goods on furnishing a bank guarantee, while allowing the DRI to retain goods up to the specified value. The merits of the seizure and the objection remained open for later examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>