<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 790 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Biswanath Hosiery Mills Ltd, holding that service tax could not be demanded for the period before the introduction of the levy under &quot;Intellectual Property Services.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized that the date of rendering the service is crucial in determining tax liability, not the date of payment. The demand, interest, and penalty were overturned, providing the appellant with consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 790 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Biswanath Hosiery Mills Ltd, holding that service tax could not be demanded for the period before the introduction of the levy under &quot;Intellectual Property Services.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized that the date of rendering the service is crucial in determining tax liability, not the date of payment. The demand, interest, and penalty were overturned, providing the appellant with consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>