<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 789 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398670</link>
    <description>A pending refund claim cannot be left undecided for years while the department issues show cause notices on an assumed basis. Where the record showed uncertainty about old records and earlier proceedings, but no clear adjudication of the claim, the Court exercised writ jurisdiction to require a decision on the available and furnished material. The respondents were directed to decide the refund claim in accordance with law within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:35:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 789 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398670</link>
      <description>A pending refund claim cannot be left undecided for years while the department issues show cause notices on an assumed basis. Where the record showed uncertainty about old records and earlier proceedings, but no clear adjudication of the claim, the Court exercised writ jurisdiction to require a decision on the available and furnished material. The respondents were directed to decide the refund claim in accordance with law within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>