<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 747 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290346</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. However, it set aside the addition of Rs. 1,01,000/- under Section 68 and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing that the assessee be given an opportunity to produce the donor and cross-examine a relevant individual. The issue of charging interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not adjudicated due to lack of argument from the assessee. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 747 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290346</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. However, it set aside the addition of Rs. 1,01,000/- under Section 68 and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing that the assessee be given an opportunity to produce the donor and cross-examine a relevant individual. The issue of charging interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not adjudicated due to lack of argument from the assessee. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>