https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398662 The High Court dismissed the petitions challenging a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the CGST Act, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules. The Court directed the petitioners to file objections within seven days and instructed the competent authority to consider these objections. The Court treated the writ petition as an objection under Rule 159(5) and directed respondent No.1 to decide on the petition promptly after a hearing. The Court also addressed incomplete service of annexures, instructing the petitioner's counsel to provide necessary documents. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. en-us Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398662 The High Court dismissed the petitions challenging a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the CGST Act, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules. The Court directed the petitioners to file objections within seven days and instructed the competent authority to consider these objections. The Court treated the writ petition as an objection under Rule 159(5) and directed respondent No.1 to decide on the petition promptly after a hearing. The Court also addressed incomplete service of annexures, instructing the petitioner's counsel to provide necessary documents. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. Case-Laws GST Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398662