<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 771 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398652</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the writ appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, advising the appellant to approach the High Court of Karnataka. The court emphasized that jurisdiction should be based on statutory provisions rather than the convenience of the parties. The dismissal was solely on jurisdictional grounds, without addressing the merits of the case, leading to the connected CMP being dismissed as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 771 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398652</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the writ appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, advising the appellant to approach the High Court of Karnataka. The court emphasized that jurisdiction should be based on statutory provisions rather than the convenience of the parties. The dismissal was solely on jurisdictional grounds, without addressing the merits of the case, leading to the connected CMP being dismissed as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>