<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 764 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr.CIT) under section 263 was not valid as the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted proper inquiries and verifications. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Pr.CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 22:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 764 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr.CIT) under section 263 was not valid as the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted proper inquiries and verifications. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Pr.CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>