<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 761 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 33,57,039/- as unexplained cash and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of Rs. 6,14,97,858/- added as excess stock. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal found no basis for the penalty proceedings under Section 271AAB. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the completeness of books and the valuation methods used during searches.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:54:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 761 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 33,57,039/- as unexplained cash and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of Rs. 6,14,97,858/- added as excess stock. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal found no basis for the penalty proceedings under Section 271AAB. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the completeness of books and the valuation methods used during searches.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>