<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 757 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398638</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition of Rs. 2,63,15,000/- made by the AO under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to prove the share premium was unjustified or from undisclosed sources, emphasizing the adequacy of evidence provided by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the addition by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:17:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 757 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398638</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition of Rs. 2,63,15,000/- made by the AO under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to prove the share premium was unjustified or from undisclosed sources, emphasizing the adequacy of evidence provided by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the addition by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>