https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398636 The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the Trial Court's judgment that the property belonged to the CPI based on title documents. The appellant Union failed to prove ownership or contributions under the Benami Act, leading to the CPI's entitlement to recovery of possession and damages. The Court found the Union's claims lacked concrete evidence and were based on hearsay. Consequently, the CPI's right to the property was affirmed, and each party was directed to bear their respective costs. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:15:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398636 The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the Trial Court's judgment that the property belonged to the CPI based on title documents. The appellant Union failed to prove ownership or contributions under the Benami Act, leading to the CPI's entitlement to recovery of possession and damages. The Court found the Union's claims lacked concrete evidence and were based on hearsay. Consequently, the CPI's right to the property was affirmed, and each party was directed to bear their respective costs. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398636