<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Orders Restoration of Company&#039;s Name in Register u/s 252(3) of Companies Act Due to Revenue Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54842</link>
    <description>Restoration of the name of the Company in the Register of Companies - The petitioner-company has earned revenue in the financial year 2013-14 to 2016-17, therefore, it is just and equitable to restore the name of the petitioner-company into the Register of Companies, maintained by the ROC - the ingredients provided for in Section 252(3) of the Act, are satisfied. - Tri</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:43:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:43:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Orders Restoration of Company&#039;s Name in Register u/s 252(3) of Companies Act Due to Revenue Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54842</link>
      <description>Restoration of the name of the Company in the Register of Companies - The petitioner-company has earned revenue in the financial year 2013-14 to 2016-17, therefore, it is just and equitable to restore the name of the petitioner-company into the Register of Companies, maintained by the ROC - the ingredients provided for in Section 252(3) of the Act, are satisfied. - Tri</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:43:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>