https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398623 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It held that the petitioner must exhaust remedies under the Act before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to present his case before the Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing the need to address complex factual issues through the appropriate legal process. en-us Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:34:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398623 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It held that the petitioner must exhaust remedies under the Act before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to present his case before the Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing the need to address complex factual issues through the appropriate legal process. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398623