<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 359 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290343</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and dismissed the suit over ownership of land due to legislative changes with the enactment of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 during the appeal process. The Court held that the Act applied retrospectively, prohibiting the plaintiff from obtaining a decree under it. The defendants were permitted to raise additional grounds based on the Benami Act, leading to the dismissal of the suit. No costs were awarded in light of the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 359 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290343</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and dismissed the suit over ownership of land due to legislative changes with the enactment of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 during the appeal process. The Court held that the Act applied retrospectively, prohibiting the plaintiff from obtaining a decree under it. The defendants were permitted to raise additional grounds based on the Benami Act, leading to the dismissal of the suit. No costs were awarded in light of the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>