<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 734 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398615</link>
    <description>The Division Bench allowed the Writ Appeal, setting aside the Single Judge&#039;s order and remitting the matter back to the ITSC to reconsider the waiver of interest under Section 234B in accordance with Supreme Court decisions. The ITSC was directed to align its decisions with the clarified legal position and provide parties with an opportunity for re-evaluation, emphasizing the correct application of tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 22:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 734 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398615</link>
      <description>The Division Bench allowed the Writ Appeal, setting aside the Single Judge&#039;s order and remitting the matter back to the ITSC to reconsider the waiver of interest under Section 234B in accordance with Supreme Court decisions. The ITSC was directed to align its decisions with the clarified legal position and provide parties with an opportunity for re-evaluation, emphasizing the correct application of tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>