<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 719 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398600</link>
    <description>The second appeal was allowed, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts. The suit for declaration and permanent injunction was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to prove her claims and the suit was barred by limitation. The court emphasized the importance of timely action and credible evidence in property disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:33:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 719 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398600</link>
      <description>The second appeal was allowed, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts. The suit for declaration and permanent injunction was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to prove her claims and the suit was barred by limitation. The court emphasized the importance of timely action and credible evidence in property disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>