<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 718 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor due to non-compliance with procedural requirements and the absence of a valid dispute. The Operational Creditor&#039;s claim of unpaid operational debt was upheld, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and the declaration of a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 718 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor due to non-compliance with procedural requirements and the absence of a valid dispute. The Operational Creditor&#039;s claim of unpaid operational debt was upheld, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and the declaration of a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>