<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (4) TMI 38 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290336</link>
    <description>Settlement of fisheries under the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation had to remain within the statutory rules, and a sanction permitting departure from the ordinary procedure did not authorise action outside the rules altogether. The Deputy Commissioner&#039;s auction and referral of the bid list to Government were treated as lawful steps within the scheme, with Government sanction operating on the settlement act itself. The later cancellation and resettlement were also treated as acts of the Deputy Commissioner, so the appellate remedy under rule 190 applied. The presumption of regularity reinforced a construction favouring legality over illegality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 17:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (4) TMI 38 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290336</link>
      <description>Settlement of fisheries under the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation had to remain within the statutory rules, and a sanction permitting departure from the ordinary procedure did not authorise action outside the rules altogether. The Deputy Commissioner&#039;s auction and referral of the bid list to Government were treated as lawful steps within the scheme, with Government sanction operating on the settlement act itself. The later cancellation and resettlement were also treated as acts of the Deputy Commissioner, so the appellate remedy under rule 190 applied. The presumption of regularity reinforced a construction favouring legality over illegality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>