https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398578 The court dismissed the petitions challenging Detention Orders under the COFEPOSA Act, finding no merit in the petitioners' claims of mala fides, delay in passing orders, non-placement of vital documents, or improper issuance of notifications. It upheld the Detention Orders and justified notifications under Section 7(1)(b) due to the petitioners' abscondence. Emphasizing the need for preventive detention, the court vacated interim orders and ordered parties to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:59:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398578 The court dismissed the petitions challenging Detention Orders under the COFEPOSA Act, finding no merit in the petitioners' claims of mala fides, delay in passing orders, non-placement of vital documents, or improper issuance of notifications. It upheld the Detention Orders and justified notifications under Section 7(1)(b) due to the petitioners' abscondence. Emphasizing the need for preventive detention, the court vacated interim orders and ordered parties to bear their own costs. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398578