<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 695 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398576</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant legitimately availed Cenvat Credit and that statements lacked evidentiary value. Compliance with Rule 9(3) was noted, and penalties were deemed unjustified. The demands and penalties were set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 695 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398576</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant legitimately availed Cenvat Credit and that statements lacked evidentiary value. Compliance with Rule 9(3) was noted, and penalties were deemed unjustified. The demands and penalties were set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>