<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1798 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance of damages for remittance of Pension Fund Trust, considering them compensatory. However, the Tribunal remitted the issue of MACT provisions back to the AO for further examination due to inadequacies in the assessment order and CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:42:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1798 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance of damages for remittance of Pension Fund Trust, considering them compensatory. However, the Tribunal remitted the issue of MACT provisions back to the AO for further examination due to inadequacies in the assessment order and CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>