<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1820 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290332</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and vacating the judgment of the Single Judge. The court directed the Government to cancel the sale of the property under the Revenue Recovery Act and return it to the appellant within two months. This decision was based on the principle of restitution, emphasizing justice, equity, and fair play, as established in various Supreme Court precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:42:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1820 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290332</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and vacating the judgment of the Single Judge. The court directed the Government to cancel the sale of the property under the Revenue Recovery Act and return it to the appellant within two months. This decision was based on the principle of restitution, emphasizing justice, equity, and fair play, as established in various Supreme Court precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>