https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290334 The Supreme Court held that the dismissal of the appeal relates back to the date of filing the withdrawal application, making the marriage on 06.12.2011 lawful. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The Court reaffirmed that a marriage contracted during a prescribed period of incapacity is not void in the absence of an express provision declaring it null. This interpretation aligns with the precedent set in Lila Gupta v. Laxmi Narain, ensuring that the Appellant's marriage was valid and lawful. en-us Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:42:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290334 The Supreme Court held that the dismissal of the appeal relates back to the date of filing the withdrawal application, making the marriage on 06.12.2011 lawful. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The Court reaffirmed that a marriage contracted during a prescribed period of incapacity is not void in the absence of an express provision declaring it null. This interpretation aligns with the precedent set in Lila Gupta v. Laxmi Narain, ensuring that the Appellant's marriage was valid and lawful. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290334