https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290315 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgments, holding that the Army Pension Regulation 16(a) and Navy Pension Regulation 15(2) are valid and enforceable. The orders forfeiting pension were justified, not arbitrary, and complied with natural justice. The court affirmed that prior satisfactory service need not be considered under these specific regulations, and the principle of double jeopardy does not apply in this context. The appeals were allowed, and the High Court's directions for reconsideration were overturned. en-us Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:23:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290315 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgments, holding that the Army Pension Regulation 16(a) and Navy Pension Regulation 15(2) are valid and enforceable. The orders forfeiting pension were justified, not arbitrary, and complied with natural justice. The court affirmed that prior satisfactory service need not be considered under these specific regulations, and the principle of double jeopardy does not apply in this context. The appeals were allowed, and the High Court's directions for reconsideration were overturned. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290315